This is the one-hundred and eighty-second in a series of examinations of comic book legends and whether they are true or false. Click here for an archive of the previous one-hundred and eighty-one.
COMIC LEGEND: Marvel once did a special G.I. Joe comic made up of a comic by Todd McFarlane that was deemed unacceptable by Marvel only a few years earlier!
Reader Billy Ray asked me about this a ways back (towards the end of last year), but I could not really help him out, as I did not have the issue in question either until recently.
As it turns out, this certainly was quite an interesting situation.
Some readers might recall that Todd McFarlane was slowly breaking into Marvel Comics in the late 1980s, and among the work he did was a fill-in issue of G.I.Joe, specifically #60.
What is NOT as well known, however, is that McFarlane actually drew the NEXT issue, as well!
For whatever reason, though, McFarlane's issue was deemed unacceptable, so venerable veteran, the late, great Marshall Rogers was brought in to draw the issue, and that was G.I. Joe #61.
Rogers WAS asked back, as he would go on to draw two more issues of G.I. Joe in the next couple of years.
By 1994, the title was no longer the top seller it was in the mid to late 80s, when it was routinely Marvel's top selling comic book (it even had a spin-off comic, G.I. Joe Special Missions). So with #155, Marvel ended the book.
However, in the time between #61 and the book ending at #155, a funny thing had happened, the young, inexperienced fill-in artist, Todd McFarlane, had gone off and become a major comic book artist superstar!
So now, somehow, the same pages that were considered unacceptable in 1987 were good enough to be published, for the first time, in a G.I. Joe Special, coming two months AFTER the cancellation of the series!!
Here's the Phil Gosier drawn McFarlane homage cover.
Here, for your amusement, is a side by side comparison of five pages from McFarlane's unaccepted take on Larry Hama's script and Marshall Rogers' accepted one.
Rogers did seem to do a better job. EDITED TO ADD: I apologize for being unclear here - it appears as though I'm knocking McFarlane's work, but by "better" I only meant that Rogers seemed to better match the style that G.I. Joe comics were using at the time, which was very straightforward storytelling. I think McFarlane's work isn't bad, and Rogers' work actually looks quite rushed (as it almost certainly was), but I just think he achieved a more standard G.I. Joe approach, based on how the books looked like back then.
All in all, though, it's a weird situation through and through.
Thanks to Billy Ray for the suggestion!
Now, for something a bit different this week.