pinterest-p mail bubble share2 google-plus facebook twitter rss reddit linkedin2 stumbleupon
TOP

CBR

The Premium The Premium The Premium

TV Legends Revealed | The Truth Behind CBS’s ‘Scorpion’

by  in TV News Comment
TV Legends Revealed | The Truth Behind CBS’s ‘Scorpion’

TV URBAN LEGEND: Walter O’Brien has the fourth-highest IQ ever recorded.

Television series and movies often base their characters on real-life people or situations. For instance, the film In and Out was based on Tom Hanks’ Oscar acceptance speech for Philadelphia. In fact, the practice is so common that people often mistakenly presume certain TV characters are based on notable people (for example, Barack Obama is often erroneously credited as the inspiration for both Jonathan Rollins on L.A. Law and Matt Santos on The West Wing).

In the case of CBS’s hit new series Scorpion, however, the series is more than based on the life of Walter O’Brien, it’s about him. At the opening of each episode, there’s a credit that reads “Inspired by the life of Walter O’Brien,” followed by narration from star Elyes Gabel (who plays O’Brien):

My name is Walter O’Brien. I have the fourth highest IQ ever recorded, 197. Einstein’s was 160. When I was eleven the FBI arrested me for hacking NASA to get their blueprints for my bedroom wall. Now I run a team of geniuses tackling worldwide threats only we can solve.

Reader Fran G. wrote in to ask whether the real-life Walter O’Brien fit the description of the fictional Walter O’Brien. Read on to find out!

First, let me note that the fictional Walter O’Brien on Scorpion can be whatever the producers feel like making him be. They can invent whatever feat that they want for him to have. The issue that some people have with this series is that the fictional O’Brien is essentially working as a weekly advertisement for the actual O’Brien. The show effectively makes him a “brand,” and if it does so while making false claims, that can be a bit annoying.

Intelligence Quotient tests work in terms of deviations from the mean, which is 100. The standard deviation is 15 points either way. So someone with an IQ of 115 is one standard deviation better from the raw mean. Someone with an IQ of 85 is one standard deviation worse than the raw mean; 160 is four standard deviations away from 100 and is therefore considered to be generally the highest one can score on the test (someone with an IQ of 160 would be in the 99.997th percentile of people). In fact, Einstein never actually took an IQ test. He’s just given a 160 as a basic estimation of his abilities. So O’Brien’s claim that he has a 197 IQ test is quite remarkable. But can he actually back it up?

When asked about the claim (which he continues to maintain on his company website) by the website Fast Company, O’Brien explained, “I was about nine years old when a teacher administered my IQ test. Unfortunately, as I was nine, I didn’t know that I needed to keep the paperwork for future reference.” He wouldn’t answer a follow-up question of “why, since he was using his IQ as a marketing element, he didn’t later take a Mensa-endorsed test in case that figure got challenged.” Note that IQ tests tend to follow pretty closely despite your age. To wit, if you have a 130 IQ as a nine-year-old you’ll typically have a 130 IQ as a 20-year-old and as a 40-year-old and so on.

So right off the bat, that we only have O’Brien’s word that he has one of the highest-ever recorded IQs is pretty fishy. (Heck, as we don’t have any paperwork to show it, is it even “recorded”?)

Next, when challenged about it while participating in a reddit “Ask Me Anything,” O’Brien conceded that he doesn’t actually know for sure if he has the fourth-highest recorded IQ, but instead noted:

There are no official records for IQ just as there are no official records for the forbes billionaire list (there are over 1000 billionaires not listed because the reporter cannot find them easily).
The Guinness Book of World Records retired the “Highest IQ” category in 1990 after concluding IQ tests were too unreliable to designate a single record holder I took the Stanford-Binet and my position statistical position can be seen using http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx Where 197 = 1/1,486,736,899 rarity then divide that by the world population

Again, very quickly, you can’t just do math like that to prove a point like that. It really does not work out to say “The odds of my score occurring are one in 1.5 billion, so therefore in a world with 6 billion people I must be fourth then.” That doesn’t make any real sense.

However, beyond that logic leap, here is an even bigger problem with what O’Brien stated there. He took the Stanford-Binet test when he was 9 years old. That would be 1984, at which point the Stanford-Binet test used was the third edition, developed by Maud Merrill. However, the chart he linked to in that reddit piece is based on the current Stanford-Binet test, which has a completely different system. In fact, studies show that high scores on the third edition (referred to as the L-M version of the test) correlate to lower scores on the modern Stanford-Binet test (referred to as SB5). In this piece, you can find a chart that essentially says an L-M score (the test O’Brien took) of 145 is equivalent to roughly a 122-133 on the current SB5 test, whose ratios O’Brien used in that reddit AMA to demonstrate that his score was the fourth-highest in the world.

So let’s put it all together:

  1. There is no written proof that he has the score he says he has
  2. He won’t re-take the test to prove it
  3. His reasoning for calling himself the fourth-highest is flawed at best; and
  4. He took an old test where high scores would be lower on the modern tests

So I think it is pretty safe to say that Walter O’Brien does not have the fourth-highest IQ ever. I’d be willing to bet he doesn’t even have a 197 IQ, but I can’t say for absolute certainty.

Mike Masnick at TechDirt did an amazing job exploring all the other various claims O’Brien has made, so be sure to check them out, and then read the follow-up article. The second Masnick article is what I’m mostly relying on for this piece.

Anyhow, as to the legend, I’m going with …

STATUS: False

Thanks to Fran G. for the question!

Feel free (heck, I implore you!) to write in with your suggestions for future installments! My e-mail address is bcronin@legendsrevealed.com.

Be sure to check out my Entertainment Urban Legends Revealed for more urban legends about the worlds of TV, Movies and Music!

  • Ad Free Browsing
  • Over 10,000 Videos!
  • All in 1 Access
  • Join For Free!
GO PREMIUM WITH CBR
Go Premium!

More Videos