It’s that time, when CBR News must present our final “Superman Returns” set report. As readers have noticed, CBR News learned quite a lot about the film last summer while in Sydney, and we’ve brought you the most in depth coverage online, from these reports to the daily Comic Reel Wrap columns by Hannibal Tabu. As a parting gift, we present you with a roundtable interview featuring the writers of “Superman Returns,” Mike Dougherty and Dan Harris.
films, and the comics or no…?
Mike: We’d kind of describe it as a pseudo-sequel in a way because Dan, myself and
Bryan were so in love with what Donner did that it felt like a mistake to go back to go
back and remake the origin story. Everyone knows the origin story. Donner did it
perfectly, as far as I’m concerned. Then Smallville is doing it again and you don’t
want two different incarnations as it breeds confusion and also it takes things further
versus going back and doing it again.
Dan: Yeah, and for us there was a visual language put onto film that we all believe
and trust in, and there’s a character basis in that language that we’ve kind of used as
our archetype and then we kind of built on top of that. Plus we’re taking elements
from the books over the years. There’ve been so many incarnations of Superman,
Superman’s been around for so long, there have been so many different plotlines
and so many kind of thing were we might say, “Oh yeah, that’s from issue 742 and
1983”, but it probably didn’t come from that. It’s like how many times did Superman
rescue a plane, how many times did this happen. Y’know, lots, In lots of different
ways and repeated different times. It’s just an amalgam of all different inspirations
from that and moving on from the old movie and the old books.
PRESS: Are you guys the only screenwriters that are going to be credited?
M: As far as this incarnation of the film it’s been me and Dan and Bryan working on
this particular draft.
D: There have been other writers, JJ Abrams did a draft of Superman for McG and
Brett Ratner years ago. Before that there was Kevin Smith and, I mean, you guys
probably know the history of all the different drafts involved. But this story is so
different. It’s a really different Superman movie. It never took from those drafts and
kind of moved on them or changed from them, it’s a different… y’know I don’t want to
use the word “take”, but it’s a different take on this kind of movie and it’s a different
kind of film.
PRESS: Given that it’s an original film, what elements are crucial to have in a Superman
film to make it a Superman film?
M: Well, it’s weird, I mean for us, at least. Again, going back to what Donner did there
are things that he did, either in the design or the tone of the film that were done so
right that they’ve kind of sunk into the public consciousness. Y’know, it’s funny if you
watch Family Guy or Saturday Night Live, if they parody Superman they’ll parody the
Fortress of Solitude that Donner did.
D: Exactly. If you look at that Fortress of Solitude it’s that exact same one that you
saw Christopher Reeve land in.
M: Yeah. Even the music. In terms of you have to have different characters. You
have to have Clark and Superman and Jimmy, Lois, Lex, umm, Perry White. I think if
you left one of those out it wouldn’t be a whole Superman film.
D: At the same time there’s an original story behind it, there’s an original plot. Which
is, pretty successfully so far, been kept under wraps of what is actually going to
happen in this movie and kind of big, terrible plan there is from his arch enemy,
what’s he meant to have to battle. All these different things have all been so far
successfully kind of kept under wraps but there is a lot of stuff (??) you haven’t seen
before, so in that ways it’s not a remake at all.
PRESS: Could you tell us?
M: Yeah, I’ll just email it to you.
D: I’ll send you the script and you just go from there!
PRESS: Psychological angle on the character??
gone for a few years and come back to the world, just the simple fact that the world
has changed in ways that he didn’t expect. He comes back to a new set of rules in
the Superman universe.
M: What’s really cool in the origin story is the man who discovers who he is and kind
of goes from the small town to the big city and kind of finds his place in the world,
and what’s happening in this is a man… when any of us go home, a lot of times you
leave home, you go off to college, you start your life and come back to your
childhood home as an adult, umm, everything that’s different is the same, you feel
like you don’t quite fit anymore And it’s a similar aspect, he’s gone for a period of
time and comes back and finds that his place in the world and with the people he
cares about – some thing’s haven’t changed, the Daily Planet’s still there Perry
White’s still running it, Jimmy’s still a photographer, Lois is still a reporter and the
group dynamic has changed.
D: And the world at large has changed so it’s kind of a rediscovery story. He has to
rediscover the world that he left and how it changed, rediscover about himself and
what his place in the world is.
PRESS: Do you find with comic book movies that the most interesting aspect is the human
aspect to the character?
D: For me it’s when the human element interacts with the superhuman element. The
little things, like in X-Men 1, Cyclops looking down at the little boy in the train station
and the boy just looking up at him with the goggles and the little (??) And in
Superman 1, Dick Donner’s movie, when Clark Kent stops the bullet. It’s the human
world that you’ve established in reality, y’know this is not a crazy universe, this is like
cars drive down the street, it’s normal an yet you’ve got your superheroes in that
world and you can… they can interact in ways you’ve never imagined before, and
when you get that outsider’s perspective, I mean, y’know the audience is an outsider,
they have lived in a real world – they get to see something magical happen inside
this world that hey live in. It’s kind of cool hitting those moments on the way is the
most exciting part.
essentially a love story. Y’know it’s like even superheroes fall in love and what
happens when that does occur? He’s completely invulnerable except for his heart.
PRESS: That’s the most interesting aspect. Those human vulnerabilities.
D: He’s physically invulnerable but emotionally…
M: He’s a wreck!
D: He’s an alien. He grew up on a farm, he’s an American kind of kid and when
things change they affect him in real ways.
PRESS: It’s essentially a love story, how does the main character change (??) ?
M: I think the… in every other incarnation of Lois Lane she has been very much the
career woman, has been too busy for a love life, too busy for Clark Kent, for anybody
else. In this version she’s still that character to a certain extent but she has fallen for
somebody. And so in a way I think the audience has to get used to that idea. It’s like
Clark all of a sudden finds out that this person he’s been in love with and partially
hoped to be reunited with when he came back is with somebody else, and I think
when you have come back and you see your high school sweetheart has fallen for
D: And yet, you are more important than anybody else ??? and that becomes a major
point to work with in the story.
PRESS: Superman hasn’t really changed in the comics very much over he years but it
seems you’re really starting to progress the character, of Lois Lane…?
M: They got married, and I think that’s really interesting.
PRESS: It took a long time!
week so again that was another reason to push the story forward because if you’re
going to make a Superman film for the first time in 20 odd year, lets not tell the origin
again lets push it forward, let’s give the audience something new and take the
characters and push them forward.
D: I think it’s successfully a retro film in the way you feel about things and yet it’s so
contemporary in the themes of the movie and what’s happened to people. It’s so
contemporary, it really is the real world today and yet it fits in the spou(??) feel of the
universe. It’s got a really great style.
PRESS: You guys are rewriting as you go, how does that work with you and Bryan?
D: This is a very special film. And we felt that ever since… it was a very easy film to
get going, when Bryan and Mick and I came up with the idea for the film and how
we’re going to attack it — the initial idea of how he’s going to do a Superman film, the
basic plot of the film and the story came through in days. It was really ink to paper
and a long treatment as Bryan said before in a matter of a few days. It hasn’t
changed dramatically since then it’s been real tight but it is such an important movie
for us we think it’s going to mean a lot in the cultural world when it comes out, we
want to be a part of it for everything, y’know, we want to be part of what Bryan calls
his “creative core”. On a practical level we’re good for him to be around because a
movie this big has tonnes of concerns and tonnes of issues, whether it be budget or
schedule, who can work when, or the set. It’s always going to have somebody
around that cares about the impact of the story, of the movie.
M: It’s like managing time travel because even the bit we’re shooting today, it’s like
small bits and pieces but if you change one little line of dialogue (??). All of a sudden
that creates a million different effects throughout the rest of the script. So somebody
has to be keeping an eye on it.
down and moving it a little bit, and we’ll remind him, “no, you can’t because that has
to happen at this exact time because the way the montage plays out”.
M: You step on a butterfly it’ll destroy a butterfly!
D: And everything falls apart. It’s good to have people whispering behind his
shoulder, just to make sure that things are heading along properly. I think that
reshoots are not fun for anybody. To help fix problems, we’re there to fix so we just
bill them for what reshoots normally cost.
M: Bryan hates the idea of 100 writers on a project, 100 monkeys. Anything you get,
the story becomes even more diluted. It’s not a creative driven project it becomes a
studio driven project. The closer you are with your writers the better. Peter Jackson
has the same relationship obviously with Fran [Walsh] and Phillipa [Boyens], and he
likes that director/writer collaboration, if it’s not going to be the same person it should
be the closest people on the production.
D: There’s a rule that they really limit the number of writers that are credited in the
end but sometimes I just wish that some writers would just let everybody be credited
so you guys or the public at large could see some of these movies that don’t work so
well but how man writers have been added…! We’ve seen cover pages of movies
that we won’t mention that had 20/25 writers listed on for the same storyline the
PRESS: How do you share the writing process?
D: We won’t make a bad joke about it this time!
M: Like we did in the blog!
Bryan and then we pick our favourite scenes, separate and write them, email them to
each other – rewrite each other, rewrite each other, rewrite each other, present to
Bryan. Sometimes two choices to Bryan, sometimes 4, 10 choices to Bryan for a
scene idea and then it just gets whittled down.
M: A lot of emailing a lot of rewriting each other but we never take it personally. It’s
kind of like, y’know, if I work on a scene and email it to [Dan] and he’ll put it in (the
vacuum??) and vice-versa and I’ll rewrite him and he rewrites me and then I get it
back and I’ll put it back in. Sometimes I’m like, “oh, that’s actually better, I’ll just leave
it” and vice versa. You never take things too personally, then Bryan reads it and
goes, “crap, crap, crap, crap, crap!”
PRESS: That’s very important as a writer to have a director you trust, trusts you, is really
D: Yeah, I think so. It’s helped him, it’s helped us, nobodies doing anything behind
anyone’s back we all just care about the movie, about the story.
M: You never take it personally, you have no ego about it.
D: We always said that X2 was boot camp for us, and maybe this is the first battle.
PRESS: How is this film relevant for 2006?
M: In terms of?
PRESS: In terms of the technology they use, in terms of how they relate to one another,
D: Yeah, I think that al of us believe the film is going to be anchored in a timeless
kind of time. I was trying to say before there are contemporary themes, this is not a
movie that is directly relatable to 9/11 or other things, we’re not taking any major
political stances in the movie.
M: We’re trying to avoid things that will date the film, so you’re not going to see like,
“Clark, have the story ready for the website in 10 minutes!”.
feel, along with Guy’s [Dyas] art design, it’s kind of timeless, a place where you can’t
put your finger on when it occurred. At the same time we’ve moved our relationships
forward, so certain things that may have been taboo or not really explored in the ’78
film, it’s a freer more liberal society, we think.
PRESS: Plastic sheets? (cellophane “S” from Superman II)
M: There are certain things you don’t change you don’t try and introduce invisibility,
the ray beam from the finger that can levitate that bottle.
D: The good thing is it is 2005 and the effects have risen to the challenge. They did
an incredible job in ’78. Now we’re even further beyond that. He’s gonna do stuff that
people are going to be blown away by. We haven’t seen a great deal of flying in
movies lately even though the technology is getting there and the visual effects are
getting there. This movie is a bout a man who can fly and using it to his absolute
M: With all the superheroes we’ve had it still seems to be a special treat.
D: Well it is a special thing to see him flying and I think it’s being done in a way that’s
PRESS: Could you talk to us about Lois/the child how the characters have advanced?
M: It’s a family, when Clark comes back he doesn’t just come back to find that Lois
has a fiancé, it’s a family unit. So in a lot of ways when he is watching Lois and
Richard interact he’s seeing what he could have had had he not left. It’s not just the
fact that he could’ve stayed and maybe fallen in love with Lois and started a family. I
think that’s what, inside, he wants most. He wants to start a life he wants to be
normal, he wants a wife he wants a kid. It’s like he’s carrying the family (??) that he
can’t quite have.
PRESS: My concern is he’ll come across as a home wrecker?
D: We’re being very careful about that. He’s not a home wrecker. At the same time
we’re talking about characters that have become more contemporary so Lois has
moved on and made a family of her own but has not married yet. James Marsden’s
playing Richard White and because he’s like the “almost-Superman”. She came back
and got the guy who’s almost Superman, he’s almost her ideal guy but hasn’t fully…
D: He’s almost the guy but he’s not quite it. She’s fully committed and has this great
relationship with him and had a child with him and yet hasn’t tied the know, hasn’t
gone that extra bit. It’s a real world family, people have indecision.
M: It’s a real situation that any of us can probably relate to. Again I talk up the high
school sweetheart and you meet with someone after 10 years of not seeing them and
not only have they fallen in love, they have this family, so it’s something that you
can’t touch, you can’t mess with that even though it’s the thing you want more than
D: Maybe there’s a little bit of him holding out for you, but you still can’t mess with
that because you’re not a home wrecker. These are big, difficult things for the
characters to deal with. We’re being very careful to be sensitive with that and not
make people luck ugly and say ugly things but still… it’s a dramatic dilemma. It adds
real weight to it.
PRESS: Where does Superman fit in with the other superhero movies (Spider-Man: happy,
M: In the middle.
D: It’s in the middle. I think it’s in the middle or closer to the happier side. We’ve seen
this after watching a lot of the movie cut now, it’s evolving, it’s really coming along
great. Things are a little weird with him but very sunny.
M: We worked on X-Men and that is a very cynical, dark film about oppressed
minorities. But this is really funny. Y’know it’s Bryan who in a way restarted the
superhero franchises by creating X-Men 1 which was sort of a concentration camp.
Now he’s hooked everything around and it’s not that the tone is going to be exactly
the same as the first film which was a bit brighter but it is less cynical. It is like Dan
said, when you have Lex he is a good mix of that darker villain who enjoys what he’s
PRESS: Luthor’s portrayal (campy or serious)
M: Again, he’s the Lex Luthor… He won’t be as campy as the Gene Hackman
version but he’s not the dark, brooding, “I must destroy Superman” Lex Luthor either.
Spacey is he’s become one man then he turns and there’s something a lot scarier
than Keyser Soze…
M: Remember the first film, it’s a classic moment, when Superman says, “How do
you get your kicks? By planning the death of innocent people?”
M: “No, by causing the death”. That’s what Kevin Spacey is doing through this entire
movie. So it’s stuff like that.
D: It’s the combination of him and Parker Posey. This sophisticated, very comic but
very scary kind of grouping. So I think he’ll be the best of both worlds.
PRESS: Can you talk about the responsibility of taking on this franchise? There’s dark
superhero movies then there’s Superman and you guys are picking it up with all
these expectations and responsibilities. Not to screw it up basically.
D: Fingers crossed, thank God we can go into the cutting room and see stuff cut and
see the film moving along and we can really say for real what’s coming out otherwise
we’d be very, very nervous and may have run back home.
M: The people taking it on, there was a moment when it was definitely… when you
do a Superman project you have to respect everything that came before because he
is the (???) superhero. As I like to keep saying, even though we’re pushing things
ahead, but we’re respecting everything that came before. From the comics, to the
Donner films to Smallville, you can not just step all over that, you can’t pretend that it
doesn’t exist. You area part of that legacy and so we had to acknowledge, even Lois
& Clark, we had to acknowledge those things, even The Adventures of Superboy, I
guess! We’re just the chapter after that.
PRESS: Don’t forget the Supergirl movie?
D: The newly released 2 disc version, derived from the international cut. That was
awesome. Directors international cut.
M: It helps.
D: It helps, yeah. I’d recommend seeing the first film absolutely to anybody, uh, to
see this film.
M: We’ve summarised things pretty quickly and easily.
D: There’s a very interesting way that the film unfolds in the first 20 minutes, we’d
love to tell you but we can’t. It’s told in a way people wouldn’t really expect.
PRESS: Did the extended version of Superman II (where Superman destroys the Fortress
of Solitude) come into any of your writing?
M: Bryan likes to say “vague history” and that’s kind of, I know it sounds repetitive
and it keeps coming up but it’s true. I mean, I like to talk about James Bond in way.
People know that James Bond is a spy, his codename’s 007, he meets up with M
and Q every now and then and gets the details of the next mission and that’s kind of
all you need to know when you go to a James Bond film and to a new James Bond
film. It doesn’t have a lot of direct references to the films that came before it but
sometimes they do, and this is very similar to that. Pushing things forward put as long
as you have the basic knowledge of who Superman is and who the characters are
D: Yeah, exactly. We love discussing the term movie history, but it [the term] works.
We’d love to explain exactly how we get into this movie, but we can’t. He would
PRESS: What lessons have you learned from other superhero movies, Spider-Man, Fan 4?
M: The whole thing about superhero projects, superhero movies and the comic
books, is there’s an audience for every type of superhero film. I mean, growing up, I
honestly was more X-Men comics than Superman. I’ll tell you that, because I loved
the plotlines of oppressed minorities and the idea of growing up feeling like an
outcast. What kid doesn’t love that(??) At the same time I still loved Superman, so,
when you watch Spider-Man, you watch Fantastic Four you can compare yourself to
each other but at the same time they’re completely different films, sometimes for
way. Superman is invulnerable to everything but Kryptonite, he can fly, the great
thing is there’s years and years of history, of foundation with him and Lois, with him
and Perry, with him and Jimmy – all these kinds of things. That’s what you own as a
movie and when you own those concepts nobody else has done them so you can
just push every idea to its furthest — how far can you go before it breaks and it turns
into a movie you don’t want to tell? — and then we take those ideas and try and work
M: And there’s things that Superman can get away with that Spider-Man and other
superhero movies can’t get away with, we can show a guy getting hit with billions of
bullets whereas Spider-Man’d be dead on the ground so, or even X-Men, so we own
that, in essence, Superman owns that, excuse me.
PRESS: Is there a difference between writing Marvel characters and DC characters?
D: I don’t think so, I’ve never felt…
M: Well people like to say that Marvel exists in the real world, and because DC has
Gotham and Metropolis doesn’t exist in our world they’re more in some alternate
universe that is a real world and Metropolis does exist.
D: That’s ironic for us because in our last movie we dealt with probably 14 people
with superpowers and now we’re dealing with one and the series of humans that
M: The cool thing with Marvel, growing up reading the books was the Marvel
characters were more tangible, they would be portrayed more realistically, you would
always have superheroes with very real human vulnerabilities. I think at the same
time DC has adopted that mindset as well with Batman and with Superman. So
there’s not really a big difference between DC and Marvel, y’know it’s not really, “this
is a DC project so we have to make it bigger than a Marvel character”.
PRESS: Have DC been involved?
D: There was a dialogue between us and them and we’ve gotten along… they’ve
been very good about it all.
PRESS: What did you think Kill Bill definition of Superman and Clark Kent?
M: It’s funny because the night that we as a group flew out from LA to Sydney – it
was me and Dan and Bryan, the producers and Brandon.
D: January 5th or so.
M: Yeah, we walked into the lounge at the airport and there was Quentin Tarantino
just sitting there. So we saw it as a good omen and Brandon got to meet him and talk
to him and just, everyone was kinda like, “Wow, we watched the film, we watched the
monologue, we’ve had it emailed to us a billion times”, so it’s great, you can’t help but
listen to it. It’s cool to know that there are other people think about this as much.
D: The cool thing for me is that until you start looking or paying attention you don’t
realise how Superman is in the cultural zeitgeist, in the minds of everything. It’s in
every bit of the universe. We’ve been to Comic-Con for the last 5-6 year, ever since I
moved to LA and have been in the movie business and to have always, every year,
seen more Superman t-shirts than any other symbol. Now that we’re a part of it you
start to see it everywhere, in people’s logos, Shaq’s tattoo, and their face paint. It’s
just amazing! I mean for us that “S” is so powerful, it’s everywhere.
PRESS: Messianic elements. Do you see him as a God almost?
M: I think you can’t help but draw that comparison I think it’s okay to do that. Even
with the story that we’re telling it’s like Messiah’s always leave you and everyone’s
always waiting for one to come back and we’re telling the story of a Messiah who has
D: We’re asking the question, is reliance on Messiahs a good thing and what
happens when they leave you and they come back? Is it better that you’ve lost the
ability to do things for yourself? Is it better not having Messiahs in the first place? So
if you’re using it as a religious allegory those are some of the contemporary themes
D: That’s part of the emotional core of the film. That’s what Jor-El and Kal-El, and
ma, Pa Kent, of course…
M: That’s one of my favourite parts of the film Unbreakable was Sam Jackson talking
about how all our comic book superheroes are essentially just the new Gods. The
story of Zeus and Hercules, they are just, it is the retelling of the Greek and Roman
Gods for our culture.
PRESS: The first Superman set up Superman II. Are you guys planting the seeds for
D: Ah, hell yeah! I can confidently say there are many seeds set up through the
movie for what will hopefully be a long-lasting new franchise.
PRESS: Villains for sequels we haven’t seen?
D: There’s some interesting villains yet some of them are very hard to conceptualise
M: At the same time you want to pick supervillains, I mean the thing with Lex is
everyone knows Superman and Lex Luthor are the guys that go head-to-head…
Batman and The Joker…
D: Lex is a gateway villain. Superman is returning to the screen, he hasn’t been here
in 25 years, Lex is our gateway villain.
M: After that, who knows?
PRESS: You can rely on him????
D: It’s already been established, people know who he is, people know what his
powers or lack thereof are, what his agenda is.
M: He’s the ultimate clash between man and Superman.
PRESS: What elements of the comics would you like to see in a film? The Bizarro
universe, Krypton the Superdog? I don’t know.
M: I personally, I’m not saying this is where we’re going or anything, I love the idea of
other Kryptonian survivors. I think that’s the ultimate event. I’m not saying this were
we’re going, that’s always intrigued me. Again not Superman II type of Kryptonian
villains that come down and, “we’re evil, we dress in black, we’re evil!” But the idea
that you think you’re the last survivor of your race and all of a sudden you meet
someone else or other people who might be…
D: For me it’s the voice in his head. His Kryptonian heritage is very important
physically in this movie because he explores it and it’s a huge motivation tool for his
character and how his character returns to our universe from where he’s been and
how he feels. That’s the quickest way of saying it.
M: It’s something he’s dealing with. I think any of us feel that in our lives. If you grow
up in America, people go “what are you?” and you’re like “what do you mean?”, “are
you Jewish?”, “well my grandfather was French and blah, blah, blah”. It’s something
that a lot of us have asked ourselves and it’s something that he, of course is dealing
with and is an issue with me, my mother is Vietnamese and my father is
Irish/Hungarian and growing up that always made me feel like the little freak who
happened to be here and people were always teasing me growing up and there was
like a point where I didn’t know anything about my family background, I didn’t know
anything at all and it kind of drove me crazy. Y’know and Bryan is adopted and I think
that’s where he relates to the story because it’s not so much about being an alien as,
“who are my parents, where do I come from? I don’t know anything.”
D: And I just imagine Bryan, he’s adopted but what if there was a recording of his
actual birth parents talking to him, explaining thing, trying to give him lessons of his
life, and he could talk back and listen to those and learn from them and see the future
and how does that interact with the people who raised you? Where’s your foundation,
where you come from now, is that your foundation? For us, Kryptonian heritage the lessons and things taught by Jor-El to Kal-El are a very important baseline for him.
PRESS: Do you think you’re adding an element of loneliness to Superman Returns,
something that wasn’t really explored in earlier films.
D: I think there’s a very contemporary idea that it’s lonely at the top. In the sense that if you are a god, and you’re the only god on Earth, you have nobody to actually relate to, and your history – your Kryptonian heritage – has been destroyed. It doesn’t exist anymore, and all that’s left are recordings for you of a dead civilization. That’s a lonely place to be.
M: We’re trying not to make him too mopey though, so don’t get that impression.
D: I just think I’ve had a preoccupation with the idea of a hero, and the idea of putting people on pedestals, whether or not they deserve to be, and what it’s like when you’ve been given the title of God or the greatest swimmer of the universe in [Imaginary Heroes], or the greatest this, or the greatest that, and what it feels like to reject those ideals, or embrace them. In that movie it was about a person who rejected the things that he was good at, and people thought he was a god simply because he was good at what he was good at. That movie came a lot out of the death of Kurt Cobain, and the idea of putting people on pedestals, and then they remove themselves from that very quickly, and how does that affect all the people of the world that he was their god. In [Superman Returns] there’s a little bit of that, too.
M: Except he doesn’t kill himself.
D: Yeah, Superman doesn’t kill himself.
M: (puts on a grim voice) Not yet!
D: He becomes a messiah for everyone, and how does that change once he leaves or comes back? It changes the people greatly when people put so much of their hopes and fears and their life into somebody else’s life.
PRESS: The X-Men movies changed some aspects of the comic. How do you expect Superman Returns to change the way writers approach the comic?
D: I don’t know. There might be a visual style that gets picked up.
M: I think you’ve already seen that to a certain extent. I’m trying to remember what it was I picked up the other day, but it showed Superman’s crystals growing up out of the ground, and I thought that was such a neat thing because as far as I know, that was Donner’s invention. It’s interesting how you mention how the XMen films changed the comics, like now all of a sudden, every time you see Cerebro in the comics it looks like Bryan Singer’s Cerebro. We don’t know. That’s not for us to mandate, but I think it would be interesting and inspiring if it did happen.
M: No, it’s more of a mystery. Even in the first film he just kind of shows up and he’s wearing it. You don’t see Phyllis Baxter on a sewing machine.
D: It’s weird because in the last few years of comic movies, from Spiderman to Fantastic Four (and actually, I think we’re partially responsible for some of that Fantastic Four costume-making stuff), but in Batman there was an entire sequence devoted to the building of the suit. I don’t know, maybe it was just a trend for a few years, like it was really important to see exactly how these things were made, and now in our film we’re just taking it for granted, and putting it in part of the history.
M: We found out-takes of Marlon Brando explaining where it came from. I think you guys might know of it. We watched all of these cool Brando out-takes.
D: That’s one of the best parts of this job.
M: All these bloopers where he’s swearing like a sailor. But there’s a monologue where Clark first goes to the fortress, he explains who he is, and blah blah blah. But he says ‘Your mother placed three swatches of fabric – red, yellow, and blue – into your pod, and when these are combined together, they will form a suit which will protect and make you… well, not make you invulnerable, but…
PRESS: Like Nuclear man.
D: How do you know about our villain?
M: It kind of happened along the way.
D: Yeah, after. Frankly, it was one of those ideas very early on, like “Oh my god. Wouldn’t this be an amazing way to give weight to this movie and to link it with the old movie,” and yet use somebody like Marlon Brando, who, unfortunately, we never got to meet, but is such an icon, and such a legend.
M: But he’s another one of those essential elements, Jor-El. You asked before what are the iconic elements you have to have in a Superman film, and you have to have Jor-El.
D: Right, and for us there’s no other Jor-El than Marlon Brando. So we used what we knew of that existed in our early version, then we kind of chased it down, and legally got it done so that we could use it, and then we went from there.
PRESS: So these are takes that haven’t been seen before?
M: Well, we’re not creating the whole… I think Bryan talked about it at Comic-Con, so it’s okay… We’re not creating the CGI actor who’ll be sitting down and having lunch with Brandon or anything. I’m sure if you used your imaginations, you could figure out where Marlon Brando might appear and what location…
PRESS: But the snippets you’re using are new?
M: It’s a mix. But it’s not the Superman II stuff
D: There’s no major discovery of Superman II unused footage.
M: Yeah, it’s not that.
M: There’s a pile of material, and the editors and sound guys will pick and choose what will be best.
PRESS: I know you’ve got a run on Ultimate XMen coming up, would you like to write Superman in the comics?
M: YEAH! It would be fantastic. (long pause) We’re talking.
PRESS: How is everyone now, compared to how you imagined them when you arrived?
M: They’re better!
D: They’re better, absolutely! The actors are fantastic. They’re unbelievable. John and Elliot are doing such a great job cutting the film that this is the most advanced cut during a film that I’ve ever seen. The way technologies come now, the Avid is so clear, and so good-looking, the machinery they’re using is so good, and John comes from composing movies, so he’s so good with music, and so good with sound effects that we shoot a scene, and two days later we’re looking at a nearly finished version of the scene and the way it cuts into the movie.
M: But what you always look for is the constant improvement. It exists in one form on the page. You write a scene, and then when it’s storyboarded, you want the storyboard artists to add something to what’s on the page that makes it better. Then when the pre-vis guys do it, there’s this constant adding of layers so that by the time you shoot it, and by the time you get to the editing, it’s… you never want to see it get worse. The worst thing is when you write a scene and you see the actors do it, and see how it was directed and cut together and it’s like “this is ten times crappier than how I imagined on the page.” What’s been great about XMen 2 to Superman is that it just keeps getting better. One of my favorite things is Sam Huntington. He has brought something to Jimmy that – I’ll be honest and say – he’s added something to it that’s made it funnier and more lively than I even personally imagined it.
PRESS: Have you met Jack Larson and Noel Niell?
D: Oh yeah.
PRESS: What did they say to you about handing you this Superman thing?
M: No, the best advice we got so far was from Margot Kidder. At Comic-Con. You talk about it.
D: (imitating Kidder) “It’s gonna be a ride. Your life’s gonna change. Just hang on tight and save your money.”
M: But she was great. We went to Comic-Con and we met… Oh, we were getting our photos taken with Margot Kidder, and you just hear this voice going “Hang on, let me get a pic!” and this flash goes off – and this is all true – the flash goes off, and the camera lowers, and it was Marc McClure. Y’know, it’s Jimmy Olson.
D: The camera lowers and we were like “woah!”
PRESS: Noel and Jack are in the movie, are there any other historical Superman family cameos?
M: Unfortunately not this round.
D: The way the characters work, they are cameos, Jack and Noel, but they’re actually roles. They’re key roles, but they’re older people, so it just kind of fit perfectly. We needed an older woman, and we needed a bartender – you know, ‘Bo the bartender – and they just worked perfectly.
M: And it’s been so much time since you’ve seen them on the big screen that they’re almost unrecognizable. Whereas if you do Margot it’s like “oh!”
D: If you do Margot it IS Margot Kidder. Margot Kidder still looks like Margot Kidder. She’s a little bit older, but she’s is Margot Kidder.
M: She still looks good.
D: Same with Marc McClure, who looks good. And everybody. It’s all be very recent. For us, Noel and Jack were this great… they haven’t been on any kind of screen for fifty years, and they fit our parts, and they’re good actors.
M: They don’t take you out of the movie.
PRESS: Are there any iconic Superman lines that you had to keep in the script?
D: There are quite a few iconic Superman lines.
PRESS: Like “it’s a bird, it’s a plane?”
D: Yeah, there’s a twist on that.
M: We try to use it in ways that aren’t predictable. As far as people pointing at the sky saying “It’s a bird! It’s a plane!” No.
D: Most of our iconic Superman lines are either ironic, as in terms of that, or they’re very poignant and move the story forward or add something.
PRESS: Is there a phone booth?
D: There’s always a phone booth. It’s the Matrix phone booth.
M: Or so we’ve heard. Two days before we started shooting a certain scene it’s like “we need a phone booth.” There’s a great video online of – I forget the guys name, the guy who did it. I think he’s an editor or a cinematographer or something – but he cut together a six minute video of… what song is it?
D: The Five for Fighting song.
D: It’s heart-wrenching!
M: Yeah, we showed it to Brandon, and I think he almost cried, too. And there’s a phone booth in and and it was like “Shit! Phone booth!” So that kind of spurred that.
D: However there will be no falling and transforming.
PRESS: No suit in a can?
D: No suit in a can!
PRESS: I noticed you’re knocking the Daily Planet ball off of the building again.
M: We are?
PRESS: I don’t know. The art on Guy’s wall indicated as much.
M: Yeah, but art gets made for things that don’t happen.
D: Oh yeah, the entire tour, by the way, has been created just to throw you guys off.
M: That’s right, Guy Dyas draws lies. That’s a joke. Do not quote me or he’ll kill me.
D: Yeah, Superman does not pose as Atlas at all during the film.
PRESS: Did you feel that there had to be a certain tone for certain parts of the dialogue, like if you’re in the news room, etc?
M: Yeah, it’s kind of funny because something that the Donner film is known for is how it almost feels like three different films, or sometimes four different films. You have your space opera at the beginning, then you have your rustic western prairie film, then you go to Metropolis and it becomes this big city, fast talking thing, and I think we’ve kind of done that. It wasn’t really planned necessarily, but it just kind of became that. You know, if you go to a newspaper room, a press room, there is that sort of feeling. We’ve all lived in New York, so we can tell you. People do walk and talk faster.
D: But the aesthetic is different. You’ll notice this time the aesthetic of the Daily Planet is very Art Deco, very Frank Lloyd Wright, and kind of the 40’s. And so is the costume, and the design, and kind of our time. You look at Donner’s film and it’s great, but you can feel that that news room is a 1975 news room. So for us, dialogue and everything is a little bit more… like Kate’s been using Katherine Hepburn as an example of a way to speak, and so it’s a little bit like if you take Hudsucker Proxy, which was the ultimate in which people in that kind of way talked, we’re pulling that back more. So it’s a little bit like that, but still it will feel like it’s own universe, you know? It’s own time.
D: Well, we’ve become friends with Al and Miles, and when this all started we wanted to make everything cohesive and to talk and make sure nobody’s stepping on each others toes, like Bryan’s said. We don’t want to step on their toes, they don’t want to step on our toes. Frankly, they’re doing a… Smallville is a period in Superman’s life that we’re not totally exploring. So they all kind of work together.
M: Yeah, we didn’t want any animosity between the two projects.
D: At the same time we want some visual cohesion. So anything that they might possibly want to move into, we want it to look like our thing so it’s all the same gigantic world of different interpretations.
M: Yeah, they keep us up to date with what they’re doing, and it’s kind of fun, because I kinda know what’s going on.
PRESS: How about the dual roles, Clark and Superman, how is it writing them?
M: It’s not that difficult. It’s not so much a Jekyll and Hyde type of thing. It’s the same guy, it’s just different aspects of the same personality.