“We finally felt the time was right and the technology is where we need it to be to create this film.”
— Craig Schulz, son of Charles Schulz, on the ripeness of a CGI Peanuts movie
“Yeah, the technology is right. Because pen and paper was never quite good enough.”
— Russ Fischer, commenting on the story for /Film
I get what Schulz is saying. “This film” doesn’t refer to just any Peanuts movie. There have already been at least two of those in traditional, hand-drawn animation. What he’s saying is that if they’re going to try to translate the Peanuts characters to CGI, that’s not something he wanted to rush into.
But while I’m not sure that Fischer’s snark is all that fair, I’m also not exactly sure why now is suddenly the time where technology has caught up and is adequate for portraying Charlie Brown’s round head and Lucy’s lumpy hairdo as computer animation. Is Schulz suggesting that the Peanuts CGI movie needs a level of technology greater than say, Toy Story or How to Train Your Dragon?
- Ad Free Browsing
- Over 10,000 Videos!
- All in 1 Access
- Join For Free!