Welcome to the four hundred and fifty-first in a series of examinations of comic book legends and whether they are true or false. Click here for an archive of the previous four hundred and fifty. This week, did Stan Lee really debate Fredric Wertham or Gershon Legman? Discover the surprising first comic book appearance by Conan! Plus, discover the issue of Doctor Strange that was lettered with a script that didn’t match the comic!
NOTE: The column is on three pages, a page for each legend. There’s a little “next” button on the top of the page and the bottom of the page to take you to the next page (and you can navigate between each page by just clicking on the little 1, 2 and 3 on the top and the bottom, as well).
COMIC LEGEND: Stan Lee debated Fredric Wertham and/or Gershon Legman on their views about comic books.
Reader Greg P. wrote in recently to ask about something he read in Stan Lee’s 2002 autobiography, Excelsior!: The Amazing Life of Stan Lee (written with George Mair), and whether it was true or not.
Here is the passage from Lee’s book, about Fredric Wertham, author of Seduction of the Innocent, which argued that violence in comic books were harmful to children.
To me, Wertham was a fanatic, pure and simple. I used to debate with him, which was fun because I usually won – but that was rarely publicized. He once claimed he did a survey that demonstrated that most of the kids in reform schools were comicbook readers. So I said to him, “If you do another survey, you’ll find that most of the kids who drink milk are comicbook readers. Should we ban milk?” His arguments were patently sophistic, and there I’m being charitable but he was a psychiatrist so people listened.
Lee then detailed a story of an old Timely “funny animal” comic book cover that drew the ire of Wertham:
Well, I was invited to have one of my Lee/Wertham debates at New York University at a class that discussed social issues. Dr. Wertham couldn’t attend, but sent one of his acolytes to speak for him. If memory serves, his last name sounded something like Legman. Out friend Legman held up that same giraffe cover that I’ve just described and started ranting about the fact that every young reader certainly understoof the subliminal sexual message being so blatantly exhibited in that drawing. It was hard for me to reconcile something subliminal being blatant, but who was I to contradict a follower of Fredric Wertham?
When the professor and his mystified students asked the raging crusader to explain what the hell he was talking about, he said that the giraffe’s neck obviously represented the male organ and – well, you can guess the rest. Within minutes, the erudite Mr. Legman was ushered out of the classroom and ordered never to return as the professor apologized to the students and me for Legman’s obscene tirade.
So, as to whether any of this happened.
First off, Lee and Wertham never had any debates. Wertham thought of people like Lee as essentially the lowest of the low, and would never indulge in actually debating with them.
Secondly, the Legman that Lee is referring to is Gershon Legman, whose book Love and Death actually predated Seduction of the Innocent, and dealt more with the idea that the depiction of violence in popular culture was a result of the repression of sex. Later in life, Legman actually claimed to have ghost-written Seduction of the Innocent.
Anyhow, there do not seem to be any evidence of Lee actually debating Legman, either. In fact, the one notable example we have of Lee actually debating someone related to Wertham came many years after Wertham’s peak, and at a time when Lee was much more well-known in the comic book field. In 1968, Lee debated a colleague of Dr. Wertham’s, Dr. Hilde Mosse on the Barry Farber radio program on WOR-AM Radio in New York (the whole thing is transcribed in Danny Fingeroth and Roy Thomas’ great book, The Stan Lee Universe). In that debate, Lee retells the same basic story about Legman he told in his autobiography, only this time he describes the events as occurring in a lecture by Legman that Lee attended. A lecture that did not end with anyone ushering Legman off of the stage. Now that certainly sounds a lot more believable, no?
Lee obviously DID greatly disagree with Wertham’s beliefs, and Lee did a fine job in the 1968 debate with Mosse.
In addition, even back in the early 1950s, when Wertham was at his peak, Lee certainly was outspoken about his distaste for Wertham’s attitudes, as were most comic book publishers. Lee actually wrote a scathing indictment on Wertham in a 1953 issue of Suspense. Check it out (with art by Joe Manneely)…
So it was not like Lee was some Johnny-come-lately when it came to denouncing Wertham. He was all over the guy during Wertham’s peak. However, Lee did not testify in front of the United States Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency and never actually publicly interacted with Fredric Wertham. Like I noted, Lee and Timely were not exactly at the top of the comic book food chain back in 1953, so it is understandable that Lee would not be more of a public face on the issue (unlike William Gaines, whose EC Comics were a much bigger deal at the time and definitely DID become the face of the issue). So it is perfectly normal for Lee and Wertham not to interact with each other during the 1950s. But it is worth pointing out that they did not actually interact.
Hope that helps, Greg!
On the next page, was there a Conan comic book years before Marvel’s Conan adaptation?
A few weeks back, I featured the story about how it was Marvel’s comic book adaptation of Robert E. Howard’s Conan that actually solidified the character as Conan the Barbarian.
However, while Conan the Barbarian was the first OFFICIAL comic book adaptation of Howard’s Conan stories, it amazingly enough was almost two decades after Conan’s FIRST comic book appearance!
You see, in 1952, the Mexican comic book magazine Cuentos de Abuelito began adapting the Conan story, “Queen of the Black Coast,” the same story that launched the recent Dark Horse Comics Conan the Barbarian magazine….
The story, translated as La Reina de la Costa Negra, was unique in that the pirate queen Bêlit became the star of the serial!
Conan was also depicted as a blonde man….
The comic was reprinted in many different Mexican comic book formats throughout the 1950s and 1960s.
So well before Marvel OFFICIALLY adapted Conan into comics, he had a long history in the medium.
Thanks to PB210 and Mr. Cromatic for suggesting this one!
On the next page, was there an issue of Doctor Strange where the lettered script was different than what was actually drawn in the comic?
COMIC LEGEND: An issue of Doctor Strange was accidentally lettered using a different script than the published comic book.
Reader Josep wrote in to ask about Doctor Strange #2, from Marvel Knights in 1999, by Dan Jolley, Tony Harris and Ray Snyder.
It is about the Marvel Knights Doctor Strange miniseries entitled Flight of Bones, written by Dan Jolley. Apparently, the mystic atmosphere of the character impregnated also the storytelling of one of the issues, as the narrative was somewhat distorted (I have not read the mini, so I can not tell you which number or who drew it, although I think it was one of the Tony Harris issues), kind of experimental narrative…but the truth was that because of an editorial error the draft of the plot that was given to the artist was not the final one but an incomplete version. In any case, it arrived to print without anybody noticing but loving the results.
I asked Dan Jolley about it and he was very helpful….
When I wrote the script for Issue 2, it was “full script” style–all the panel descriptions and captions and dialogue in one document, turned in at the same time. Let’s call that “Draft A.” However, once Tony got the script, he had some different ideas about how the blocking in a lot of the scenes should go, and pencilled the issue accordingly. I got the pencils, saw that there were changes from the Draft A script, and re-wrote all the dialogue to fit Tony’s art. We’ll call the resulting script “Draft B.”
I sent in Draft B, waited for the issue to come out…and when it did, I saw that the letterer had mistakenly been given the Draft A script instead of Draft B. So what readers saw was dialogue intended to accompany an earlier version of the issue. Needless to say, it ranged from odd to baffling, but it was basically just the result of a clerical error.
As Josep notes, though, the resulting story really didn’t seem all THAT different, although at times it definitely did stand out a bit, like the first page doesn’t really fit…
And this fight is a bit odd…
But overall, it is kind of remarkable at how well it all worked out.
Thanks to Josep for the suggestion and thanks to Dan Jolley for the information!
Okay, that’s it for this week!
Feel free (heck, I implore you!) to write in with your suggestions for future installments! My e-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org. And my Twitter feed is http://twitter.com/brian_cronin, so you can ask me legends there, as well!
Here’s my newest book, Why Does Batman Carry Shark Repellent? The cover is by Kevin Hopgood (the fellow who designed War Machine’s armor).
If you want to order a copy, ordering it here
gives me a referral fee.
Follow Comics Should Be Good on Twitter and on Facebook (also, feel free to share Comic Book Legends Revealed on our Facebook page!). Not only will you get updates when new blog posts show up on both Twitter and Facebook, but you’ll get original content from me, as well!
Here’s my book of Comic Book Legends (130 legends – half of them are re-worked classic legends I’ve featured on the blog and half of them are legends never published on the blog!).
The cover is by artist Mickey Duzyj. He did a great job on it…(click to enlarge)…
If you’d like to order it, you can use the following code if you’d like to send me a bit of a referral fee…
See you all next week!